1. The submissions received for arbitration are presented in the "original articles" section. 

2. Each writing is submitted to the judgment of one or two experts external to the publishing entity in a double blind system. The evaluator does not know who the author/s are and also the author/s does not know who/is the evaluator. 

3. The final opinion includes: "Its publication is not recommended"; "To be published, major modifications are suggested"; "To be published, minor modifications are suggested" or, "its publication is recommended".

4. In the case of non-recommendation of publication, it is submitted to the judgment of a second evaluator.

5. In the case that "to publish modifications are suggested" are greater or lesser, we proceed to communicate them to the author / s who can consider the observations made by the evaluator and forward the corrected writing.

6. The author/s has the right to make a disclaimer if they consider that the observations made by the evaluator / s are not correct or modify the communication of their research. 

7. The Editorial Committee once received the written with the observations made by the author/s, makes the final decision to continue the process or not of the publication.